Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FRIDA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 07:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

FRIDA

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software. "It is referenced in another wikipedia article" doesn't really cut it for notability, and the fact that it will be in a paper in the future doesn't work much easier, especially since the article creator is also the writer of said paper. Delete and move on. Ironholds (talk) 08:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. No claims of why this is notable in any way. NoVomit (talk) 10:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Insufficient claim to notability. Glass  Cobra  02:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 *  Speedy [Really really fast & unambiguous] delete: no assertion of notability. HrafnTalkStalk 13:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no speedy delete tag for software. Ironholds (talk) 13:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.