Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FSQL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete-- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 17:38, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

FSQL
Fuzzy Structured Query Language (FSQL) is a hoax not notable. Ezeu 03:14, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * comment: Seems like it might actually be legit:, , , . I don't know enough to make an informed vote, though. Peyna 03:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Hasn't really moved beyond original research.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  03:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Change to strong keep if the article lists an important business solution utilizing FSQL. Ruby 03:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Not convinced it won't be notable (yes, I know, not a crystal ball).--SarekOfVulcan 03:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Searching "Fuzzy Structured Query Language" as a phrase on google returns 17 links !, of which several are Wikipedia articles or mirrors. Add FSQL to the search and you get 6 links , of which all but one are wikipedia articles – and this is supposed to be a notable programming related topic? --Ezeu 04:07, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This articles describes 2003 computer science research (see ) -- so it is verifiable and definitely not a hoax. However, it is a far cry from a standardized query language such as SQL.  Given that there is one citation for the linked paper, and the fact that there are as many Google scholar hits for "FSQL" about "functional SQL" papers as for "fuzzy SQL" (i.e. one each), this is not notable.  Thus, Delete.  I wouldn't mind a  one-or-two-sentence merge to Fuzzy logic.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-23 08:14Z 
 * I dont want to be a nuisance, but a merge would be wrong. This thing does not warrant a mention on Wikipedia. Even the javascript I wrote last month is more notable. --Ezeu 14:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as above, unverifiable and/or original research. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia  12:27 2006-01-23
 * Delete per dylons, original research. Mushintalk 14:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Terence Ong 14:26, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.