Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FTH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

FTH
Delete as fancruft. SYCTHOS talk 01:40, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete World of Warcruft. Ruby 02:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I wasted a lot of my life on World of WarCraft, so trust me when I say this in no way deserves an encyclopedia article. For The Horde!!!  (Sorry about that, I played as a Tauren on a Roleplaying server, we said that a lot)  Cyde Weys  04:37, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the Forsaken! -Ikkyu2 08:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic. LOL, Ruby. Turnstep 14:40, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for great justice -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 16:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom... and the alliance races are far superior... Nick Catalano (Talk) 17:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I cannot see how this could possibly be of any use or interest to anyone who doesn't spend at least 8 hours a day playing World Of Warcraft. (I spend at least 8 hours a day in front of a computer myself, but not contiguously, and the most of it is actual work (they pay me for writing Java code), contributing to Wikipedia, or reading e-mail. Not some geeky MMORPG.) J I P  | Talk 18:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not encyclopaedic. Latinus 19:32, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ruby's coining of the neologism of the week :-) Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 20:22, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.