Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F G D

F G D was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

F G D
Looks like a description of a card from some trading-card game. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 04:09, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, not encyclopedic. Gazpacho 04:30, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Probably copied from the back of the card and therefor a copyvio. DCEdwards1966 05:11, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * EXTREME DELETE. &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 06:26, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * (Extreme) Delete. Copyvio, fancruft, non-encyclopedic, and non-notable!  --Idont Havaname 07:10, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * I summon the Blue Eyes White Dragon and use it's Breath of Deletion on the Five God Dragon, destroying the monster and making you lose 2,000 life points. -- [[User:Bobdoe|Bobdoe (Talk)]] 08:31, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Randy 12:02, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete moderately, delete calmly, delete gently, delete mildly, delete tenderly, but delete. Unencyclopedic. Probable copyvio. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 00:09, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Icky-poo. Summon the Five God Dragon for total annihilation! - Lucky 6.9 00:26, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice Wyss 12:21, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.