Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faaimata Hiliau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Faaimata Hiliau

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unfortunately I don't see how this meets WP:BASIC. The only independent article that offers WP:SIGCOV is this one by The Sydney Morning Herald. The two magazine articles by the Uniting Church are not independent and don't count towards notability. C F A 💬  01:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Christianity,  and Australia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  03:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BASIC (and even WP:GNG if you count the Compass documentary in addition to The Sydney Morning Herald feature article mentioned above). Added two articles from The South Sydney Herald about recent activity related to climate change which Hiliau has been involved in (speaking at Pasifika community gathering and formal visit to government ministers and MPs in Canberra), as well as an external link to the ABC TV Compass documentary about Hiliau and the future of the United Church, with a viewership of 166,000 in August 2023 per MediaWeek. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep, per GNG. There were already 2 independent sources with SMH and compass, and Cielquiparle has added 2 more.
 * Newystats (talk) 03:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Comment She seems to be notable but the references am not sure could have given her a keep.--Meligirl5 (talk) 20:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep as a hugely important non-Anglo female faith figure in New South Wales’ third biggest Christian denomination. SproulesLane (talk) 22:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion that together with the references in the article shows a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.