Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabíola nogueira

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Stormie 08:38, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

Fabíola nogueira
Substub about Brazilian transvestite porn actor. I doubt he/she is notable. Anon who created this has all his other "contributions" either reverted or here in VfD. jni 13:39, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Quoting Substub,
 * If you don't want to turn it into a stub,
 * Speedily delete it. Articles with no context are speedy deletion candidates.

Lev 14:56, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I considered pressing the delete button for this, but then I saw that Deb had sent Suzana holmes to VfD, so I decided to give this the same treatment. On second thought, this seems indeed a case where CSD rule 4 applies. Anyone wanna speedy this? (I've done enough of those today) jni 16:09, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete as non-notable. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 17:36, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Some porn stars are indeed quite famous, i.e. Linda Lovelace. Transvestism is certainly notable, so clearly transvestive porn stars have the potential to be notable too.  Considering the contributions Brazil has made to erotic woman's clothing, I have to assume there is nothing inherently non-notable about a Brazilian transvestite porn actor.  I also don't think it matters who created the article, or what the fate of their other articles may be.  So, with all that out of the way, I think we have to evaluate the notability of the subject of this article on its own merits.  Unfortunately, I don't see any :-)  The article doesn't tell us anything about what the person did to earn notability (it doesn't even say they're a porn actor, so I assume jni has additional knowledge).  For that reason, and that reason alone, I'm voting Delete.  If somebody (ahem) fleshes out the article to provide the additional details substantiating notability, I'll change my vote.  --RoySmith 18:08, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)