Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabrejay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:03, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Fabrejay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable dj, sourced entirely to fake news blackhat seo sites and press releases. Praxidicae (talk) 13:34, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. As the nominator has pointed out, those references aren't as legitimate as they first appear: the London Post, for example, appears to be attempting to appear legitimate by using the title of a publication which ceased trading in 1771. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 16:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's consensus that club DJs are run of the mill, and short of significant coverage, they are not automatically notable because of where they work or for whom they work. There's no evidence in the article that this one is an exception, but ping me if you become aware of good sources. Bearian (talk) 18:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the coverage needed to establish notability is in the article nor can I find anything meaningful in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 01:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.