Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabrizio Brienza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 03:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Fabrizio Brienza

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Subject is Italian model and actor. Majority of refs are self-published/IMDb/dead/minor etc. Does not constitute significant coverage. Creator is involved in sockpuppet case. Christopher Connor (talk) 04:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep My mind is boggled as to why this article is up for deletion. This person is certainly a notable person with a fairly lengthy list of special appearances and modeling work with high-profile designers.  As for the complaint above, maybe some more reference work needs to be done as well as some POV work but why delete it? Hippychick 02:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hippychickali (talk • contribs)
 * Surprised keep, but rewrite. His acting roles are trivial, and I have no clue about his status as a fashion model. However, he has a weirdly high-profile job as a doorman (one of those people who bar the riffraff from exclusive places). He was anointed a "door god" by the Village Voice according to this article. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:17, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources show notability. Anyway it's better to have a positive article about someone than a negative one. Wolfview (talk) 00:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.