Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Face Up (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  18:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Face Up (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Only found maybe one other source besides the one listed. Probably not a notable magazine. Dronebogus (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep as there is at least one good reference showing significant content - the Irish Independent piece that is already in the article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, c, l) 04:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the above and WP:GNG, that one piece from Irish Times saves it from deletion. "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected". - 𓋹 𝓩𝓲𝓪𝓭 𝓡𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭 𓋹 [user |  talk] 12:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - weak article unlikely to grow much, but adequately sourced and without serious issues. &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 11:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.