Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facebook secret page of universities in Hong Kong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Facebook secret page of universities in Hong Kong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

More of an essay than an article, none of the provided sources (the reliable ones that is) are actually about this specific subject, the only remotely relevant one being one about a chinese school, nothing to suggest this is actually a notable thing Jac 16888  Talk 18:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into anonymous blogging, where it seems to be on topic. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:19, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - first, the article title is a bit of a misnomer. The article is not about "secret pages" on Facebook but about Facebook pages for telling "secrets". Regardless, the proffered sources don't appear to establish the independent notability of the specific concept of secrets pages for Hong Kong universities. I'm not seeing a merger as a solution because there really isn't anything to merge. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 19:34, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  essay  // 18:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete- There is no notable or clear topic here. The only two reliable secondary sources are two articles that appeared in the same newspaper on the same day. Other sources are primary or secondary school websites etc. There is no such topic. A few of the off-topic/coatrack sources could be used at Anonymous blogging but I would not call for a merge here as the sources that could be transferred are not about the topic of this article that is up for AfD.-- — Keithbob •  Talk  • 23:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've decided to change my vote to delete.  The topic does not seem notable, and the others have convinced me that there's nothing worth merging. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This is not the type of thing we need articles for. It appears that reliable sources do not exist anyway  p  b  p  20:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.