Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facebook terrorism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 03:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Facebook terrorism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Obvious neologism, clearly in violation of WP:NFT. The author's username implies that they may be the creator of this neologism  Intelligent  sium  01:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I found three refs on Facebook terrorism and added them to the article... no comment on keep or kill. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 01:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * These references are not relevant to what is discussed within the article.  Intelligent  sium  02:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: page bordering on original research, leaving little doubt that the creating user and the Dan Walder mentioned in the article are one and the same. Also contains broad sweeping unsourced claims, e.g. Daniel Walder is the first person to attempt to incite a social web based networking revolution via Facebook. --  role player 01:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Though this seems to be an emerging concept I couldn't find any reliable resources dealing specifically with the term.  From what I could find there seem to be two concepts here:  The first deals with terrorists using Facebook to coordinate their activities, and second deals with individuals or groups using Facebook to harass and/or intimidate other individuals or groups.  These concepts might have a place in broader articles dealing with digital terrorism and bullying but don't, as of today, stand as an article.  One day it might be an accepted term but that doesn't justify creating it today according to WP:NOTCRYSTAL.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 03:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:OR. Joe Chill (talk) 17:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: the text in the sources appear to contradict what is asserted in the text as it stands. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 16:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is a tetriary source, not for things made up in a day, and not for original research or synthesis. Bearian&#39;sBooties (talk) 18:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Lol, finally some real OR. It is almost worth keeping as an example of the only actual OR/SYNTH I have ever seen in an AfD. Also, there is some BLP vio and issues about using Facebook as the defining parameter for the subject. Anarchangel (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.