Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facecrime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Newspeak words. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Facecrime

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lesser known Newspeak term, with no effort to prove notability. Believe it to be largely non-notable, from google searches. Sadads (talk) 12:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing sets this particular word apart from the rest. The topic as such is covered well in Newspeak. If we really wanted to, we could have a list of all newspeak terms, but having a page on every single one violates WP not a dictionary - and that includes fictional languages. Travelbird (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I added two references. Technology like this is being developed, some of it already out there, and some reliable sources are making the comparison to Facecrime.   D r e a m Focus  11:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue.  D r e a m Focus  11:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Newspeak words. Not notable enough for its own article, plenty of space for a brief mention at the list article.  Snotty Wong   communicate 18:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Newspeak words -- no indication of 'significant coverage' beyond direct discussion of Orwell's work. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 11:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Newspeak words. There's no substantial application of this that cannot be described simply in that list.--Yaksar (let's chat) 01:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.