Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facepunch Studios (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Garry's Mod. Spartaz Humbug! 03:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Facepunch Studios
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:CORP as there lacks any form of significant coverage of the company. Codf1977 (talk) 16:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC) Note : forgot to check if it had been deleted before, it has so may be it is CSD G4. Codf1977 (talk) 16:43, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I declined the speedy as the current version is substantially different from that which was deleted. As yet I'm undecided on the AfD, but if it does end in deletion a redirect to Garry's Mod seems appropriate. the wub "?!"  16:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Gained some notability inside a large GMod community. Should be enough to keep. Artem Karimov (talk | edits) 19:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I wish the community well, but if notability hasn't been established in the mainstream world then they fail the general notability guideline. --Teancum (talk) 16:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep.-- in te la ti 02:27, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Please provide a rationale for keeping the article. Simply saying KEEP does not explain why it fits into Wikipedia policies. --Teancum (talk) 16:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Redirect - the notability of GMod does not mean automatic notability for the parent company per WP:NOTINHERITED. No reliable sources with significant coverage of this company. (see search) Mod is notable, company is not. --Teancum (talk) 13:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed to redirect. I suppose it's a plausible search term. --Teancum (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP, not notable in itself. Delete + create as redirect to GMod. Jarkeld (talk) 12:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge details to Garry's Mod, redirect there. Possibly other products in future so rather see the history kept, but no need for the article now.--M ASEM  (t) 12:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Garry's Mod although the mod it creates is notable, the company does not meet WP:CORP. Redirect to GMod Nomader (Talk) 13:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Garry's Mod - The article doesn't establish significant coverage in third party sources, and I couldn't find any sources when I searched. —Ost (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Garry's Mod - Is not notable enough for significant mention, much less its own article. Mamyles (talk) 00:14, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.