Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facilities at University of Dhaka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Facilities at University of Dhaka

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

as per WP:GNG and WP:NOTGUIDE. this article has no encyclopaedic value, it is purely a guide for students. I oppose redirect and merge as any pertinent info is in the main University of Dhaka already. Also it's an unlikely search term. LibStar (talk) 23:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - IMHO the nom's spot on - If you're a student here - This comes in handy, If on the other hand you live anywhere but Dhaka then chances are this article is going to be absolutely useless to you but meh that's my take on it, Anyway imho not seeing any encyclopedic content here so will have to say Delete. – Davey 2010 Talk 04:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Comment Poorly written and needs a lot of ref-impore BUT valid spin-off. –  nafSadh did say 16:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. There are twenty or so University of Dhaka related articles which I've recently been tidying a little, prompted by User:LibStar proding a couple of them. The prods are easily salvageable but on this one I agree; little of the content is appropriate to Wikipedia and most of what is can already be found in one or another of the twenty.
 * suggest that over the next couple of days you merge into the other articles any content that you consider particularly valuable; it really isn't encyclopaedic for the most part. -Arb. (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Univ of Dhaka is really not in my priority list and every article related to it is absolute mess. I wish there was someone was interested and active on Wikipedia from the university and would improve that. I concur that this spinoff is not encyclopedic on its own merit. Sadly the parent article is neither. –  nafSadh did say 15:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Why does there have to be more than one Dhaka University article? One page is enough to cover these topics, in fact the DU page already has a list of faculties. The main university article needs work. I don't see other major Asian universities with so many subpages.--203.112.78.254 (talk) 11:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The key points could be adequately covered in the main article on the University of Dhaka. Detailed lists of buildings and their capacities for a single university isn't encyclopaedic content -- Helenabella   (Talk)  07:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and fails WP:GNG.It is covered in the  University of Dhaka.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.