Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facing Future (Organization)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 04:38, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Facing Future (Organization)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG, despite having notable members in Earle, and Wadhams. Sources in the article either don't mention this organization, or are primary or unreliable. I can't turn up really anything in the way of significant coverage that is not produced by people affiliated with the group. Seems to be WP:TOOSOON. Hog Farm Bacon 03:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 03:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 03:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Regarding WP:NORG Facing Future is an non-profit educational organization AaronNGray — Preceding undated comment added 03:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

WP:TOOSOON does not seem to apply to non-profit organizations AaronNGray


 * Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Facing Future does not pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". I was unable to find coverage about Facing Future. No prejudice against recreating the article once Facing Future receives significant coverage in reliable sources. Cunard (talk) 10:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

I have added links to the page to demonstrate verify Stuart Scott's notability (including Stuart Scott introducing Greta Thunberg at COP24) and Facing Futures pre history and indirect prominance. AaronNGray  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article doesn't make any assertion of notability and doesn't cite any of the type of coverage in secondary sources that would allow it to meet the WP:GNG.  FalconK (talk) 05:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:47, 20 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.