Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faciomúsica coadunatio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shimeru (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Faciomúsica coadunatio

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Prod contested on the grounds that the concept is becoming notable. However, this search returns nothing of value that would confirm that Wikipedia should indeed refer to this concept using this term. Fails WP:NEO. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 15:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- --Darkwind (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * “The fact that you haven't heard of something, or don't personally consider it worthy, are not criteria for deletion.” Faciomúsica Coadunatio is a noumenon similar to The Long Tail in it's application to online business with regard to Digital distribution that is a driving force behind current artists in the digital age. The term is derived from the Latin words “facio” meaning “fashion”, “musica” meaning “music”, and “coadunatio” meaning “a uniting”. So it can be called a neologism yet is an abstract concept. Jeremy Wineberg of Invisible DJ, who takes credit for “The Music Tee” says, it “combines digital music and fashion in one eye-and-ear-catching package” . I postulate that this is the term for the original idea regardless of Fenn being the first documented source. If this is not the proper term, do you have a suggestion? If not, please allow this article to stay as the term is used by insiders. Keep or Merge. Spencer Rothchild (talk) 20:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * If the Fenn interview is the only documentation available to describe the concept itself, then I'm afraid the concept fails our notability guidelines, and thus cannot be described in Wikipedia, except in individual articles about those who engage in this practice, and yet without giving the practice a name. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 21:15, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article claims that this expression is in the Latin language, but Latin doesn't even use the acute accent, so it can't be. This damages the credibility of the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete nothing in gnews . LibStar (talk) 04:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.