Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Factualize


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  02:49, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Factualize

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. If it is a notable word then it should be transcribed to Wiktionary. Woland (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Deletualize per nominator. I doubt Wiktionary wants this either.  JBsupreme (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Also note that Wiktionary and Dictionary.com do not have definitions about this word. Schfifty  Three  21:39, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom: Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. Cliff smith  talk  22:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:DICT. Schuym1 (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.