Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Economics and Management, CULS Prague


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not established. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Faculty of Economics and Management, CULS Prague

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

hanged this to a redirect to Czech University of Life Sciences Prague on the grounds that individual faculties are rarely notable; article creator begs to differ. TheLongTone (talk) 15:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep - Faculty of Economics and Management, CULS Prague is largest Faculty in Czech Republic - proof - official stats of http://www.msmt.cz/index.php?lang=2 : http://dsia.uiv.cz/vystupy/vu_vs_f1.html (more than 10,000 students + more than 2000 Foreign exchange students) - probably is also largest Faculty in Central Europe. If this large Faculty can not have own wiki page should be deleted also majority of other (mostly smaller) faculties - for example: Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University,  Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, University of Economics in Prague,  Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jaffna,  Faculty of Economics, Ljubljana,  Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade,  Faculty of Management of Warsaw University of Technology and thousands of others. Another reason for its own wiki page is a little different focus from the parent university. I am believe that the largest faculty of economics in Central Europe, its wiki deserves.TradeCZ (talk) 16:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I still see no need for a serarate article, especially given that at present there is no content that could not be found in a prospectus.TheLongTone (talk) 12:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Content has been expanded TradeCZ (talk) 08:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep - After expanding is IMHO acceptable. --Postrach (talk) 09:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete perhaps and Redirect instead as this still seems questionable for solid independent notability. Asking who asks to be notified of these subjects and I welcome his analysis.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The question is whether this is a first order division of a university,, or an academic department. The standard for academic departments is being world-famous, or an international basis. That does not meet the situation here. The criterion for a first order division is 1/usually to include medical or legal schools, and sometimes business schools, on the basis that they are often --at least in US universities -- independent of the university. 2/otherwise, being a major part of a very iconic  and important university and recognized as such internationally--the model for this is the University of California. Size by itself is not sufficient.
 * but ,as mentioned above, a key factor is whether there is sufficient content.  There is no such content at the moment--only a list of degrees. This sort of content will fit perfectly well in the main article for the university..When there is some genuine encyclopedic content then there can be an article  DGG ( talk ) 22:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 10:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Content will be extended in the coming days / weeks. Do you really think that, for example the faculty Faculty of Management of Warsaw University of Technology has a greater right to have a wiki page?193.84.36.110 (talk) 14:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Nobody is suggesting that. This discussion is about the faculty in Prague. If anyone believes the one in Warsaw not to be independently notable then they can start a separate deletion discussion for that, where the issue will be decided on the same grounds. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 16:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

 Keep  - TradeCZ (talk) 08:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC) Duplicate "keep" stricken. One person one !vote please. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 09:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:ORG. being the largest in the Czech Republic does not grant automatic notability. Nor does WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments. LibStar (talk) 08:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect I see no basis for creating a separate article here; I see no evidence of coverage specifically for the faculty, so WP:GNG is not cleared; being the largest faculty does not grant inherent notability; and if you purge the lists per WP:NOTDIR, there is not enough information for a standalone article in any case. Vanamonde93 (talk) 22:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.