Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering CTU


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Merge to Czech Technical University in Prague, as there is no assertion of independent notability. Lara ❤  Love  16:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering CTU

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete each faculty or department of a university isn't notable apart from its university - anything sourced and useful can be merged with the article on the uni, but this stand-alone shouldn't be kept - or we'll have hundreds of similar articles for each of the thousands of universities and hundreds of thousands of high schools... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per essentially what the nom said, "anything sourced and useful can be merged with the article on the uni, but this stand-alone shouldn't be kept" I'm not sure why it's at AfD but am presuming since he's an admin he has a reason for doing this rather than just merging TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 17:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * merge as suggested, but I note that there will be a few cases where the most famous university departments will actually have sources for notability. DGG (talk) 00:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * agreed, I can think of a few even off the top of my head, but this doesn't appear to be one of those cases TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 03:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Why should it be deleted? There are hundreds, if not thousands, of faculties which are on wikipedia. They are not notable apart from their universities. They are not the most famous university departments as well. Why are those faculties kept and this one cannot be? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasooon (talk • contribs) 14:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Response I realize this is your article that you worked hard on, but just because other stuff exists doesn't mean it, or this, should. Articles are evaluated on a standalone basis. THere is no evidence that this specific faculty is notable. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 16:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Czech Technical University in Prague and do not delete the history which must be retained for GFDL reasons. TerriersFan (talk) 15:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable. Yopie 07:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yopie (talk • contribs)
 * Keep, verifiable. Why not have articles on faculties if sources are available? --Oldak Quill 12:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.