Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fadel Soliman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Speedy delete . (non-admin closure) M assiveYR   ♠  09:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Fadel Soliman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a writer and public speaker, formatted like a résumé rather than an encyclopedia and referenced entirely to primary sources and YouTube videos and a user-generated "citizen journalism" site, with only one reference that's even maybe a reliable source. So there simply isn't enough valid sourcing here to clear WP:GNG, and nothing stated in the article body entitles him to a free presumption of notability in the absence of enough valid sourcing to clear GNG. Bearcat (talk) 04:36, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  06:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  06:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  06:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as unambiguous promotion. Has all appearance of being a fan page or an autobiography, with content such as:
 * "Popularity: Hundreds of Arabic and English videos by Fadel Soliman can be found on YouTube where there are excerpts from his appearances on TV channels, as well as speeches delivered in the Middle East and in the West.[14]" [link to youtube channel]
 * I've requested a speedy deletion under G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.