Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fadianism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy A7. Roy boy cr ash  fan   03:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Fadianism
Hoax Belief. Even if it does exist doesn't register any google hits so its unverifiable & non notable Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  18:33, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete—or should I say "anathematize"?—per nom. Even granting the very slim probability that this isn't a hoax, "several" adherents does not notability make. &mdash;Zero Gravitas 18:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. --- Comment: Not to be confused with Fabianism.  Austrian 19:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I probably would have tried to see if any admins would agree to a speedy, since it lacks any reasonable assertion of notability. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 19:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pure original research, if it's not a hoax. &mdash;Viriditas | Talk 19:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 22:33, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, and possibly a joke.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! - review me 00:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as CSD:A7 non-notable. ~Kylu ( u | t )  03:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.