Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   userfied. 10:11, 16 February 2012 Billinghurst (talk | contribs | block) moved Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz to User:Eric01pd2017/Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz [without redirect] ‎ (move to user's subpage) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per Articles for deletion/Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz. For some reason, CSD G4 was declined. StAnselm (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. This was first deleted in 2007 at Articles for deletion/John Stump, and deleted again in 2010. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I went through website after website and book after book to find absolutely nothing that would establish notability. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 20:18, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. As much as I love this piece of music, it's not notable in and of itself.Tyrenon (talk) 21:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

So... what do we do now? StAnselm (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I declined G4 because it's for reposts or things close to reposts, not for completely new articles on the same subject. Nyttend (talk) 01:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I am informing you that i start new article in my own space, that will add when it is finished. A lot of things changed since 2007... We have tons of sources, this subject have constant 30, 40 views a day, it is a orchestration that is known and it is also social phenomenon. -- WhiteWriterspeaks 18:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * OMG, it is awfully interesting. I see total lack of ANY relevant, reliable source on this subject. This composition belongs to the internet underground, unfortunately, it cannot stay on wiki under these conditions... Good delete, again unfortunately. I will not create subpage, just to let you know. -- WhiteWriterspeaks 19:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.