Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failed Television Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Failed Television Series
This page suffers from the usual subjective list original research and neutral point of view problems. In addition, it would seem that a category would better fit this sort of endeavour. I'm not using the word cruft, but I see no need for this article to continue in its present form. Erechtheus 19:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. This article would purely be subjective as seen with such shows as Emeril and Joey. It's bound to lead to some edit wars, so might as well delete it. --  Nishkid64  Talk  19:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. vague and arbitrary criteria ensure this will always be a no original research violation.  I'm not even sure a catagory would be suitable here.--Isotope23 19:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I actually meant a set of categories with objective criteria that would in effect cover the same ground. If they do not already exist, I would like to pursue categories for shows with fewer than ten episodes, shows with fewer than twenty episodes, and so on. Erechtheus 19:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, a series of well defined & objective categories would probably work.--Isotope23 18:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete While there are certain criteria used within the television industry to define successful shows, there are none that are widely accepted enough to maintain this sort of list. Without an accepted criteria, any listing on this article would be unavoidably POV.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Zaxem 03:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.