Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FairFX (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 16:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

FairFX
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article previously deleted as promotional has been recreated by a single purpose account probably with a COI. Sources are still thin and it may not be notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Maugster (talk) 17:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a publicly traded company and the article is based upon in-depth sources. I did indeed create this article on behalf of FairFX, and freely state my conflict of interest. However, COI is not a reason for deletion, nor is promotionalism (which I disagree exists in this short, concise article). The company is highly notable. Phresh Kicks (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * SPA Above !vote is also from a single purpose account, presumably sock of other article editor Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete article is still basically spam, with little about the company except what it sells Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate]]. talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.