Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FairShare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

FairShare

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:GNG. This article reads like a personal essay and not an encyclopedia article. It just describes an idea someone came up with and a name for it, but does not cite any sources or provide reliable third-pary coverage. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Thought that a redirect to Ian Clarke might make sense, but insofar as it's mentioned there, it cites only a document he wrote about it, so not really due. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 20:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just someone's idea, which sounds good, but lacks the sources to stick around. Searches also didn't show anything about it. AdoTang (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.