Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fair Bank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Fair Bank

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There are a lot of articles on this company, but none of them seem to meet the guidelines of WP:NCORP. Here is my analysis of the ones I could find:

The company has quite the promotional machine, so independence may be hard to establish. Ovinus (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ovinus (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotional and primary-sourced. It's way too soon to tell if this will be a notable company. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, somewhat promotional article tone, lacks wp:SIGCOV. Nythar T . C 01:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Texas.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as it does not seem to have achieved anything yet, hence the lack of notable information. Nintendoswitchfan (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.