Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fair Oaks Avenue (Pasadena, California)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f eminist 05:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Fair Oaks Avenue (Pasadena, California)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notability asserted, tagged for sources since 2007. Deprodded after 7 day expiry. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - "... is a major north-south road connecting the communities of Altadena, Pasadena, and South Pasadena" is an assertion of notability. Books have extensive coverage going back as far as 100 years of the road’s development, the importance of the growth of Pasadena and South Pasadena and route description. --Oakshade (talk) 20:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - We're not here to run Google Maps, whilst the road may be 'major' for the suburb, it's hardly major on an encyclopaedic scale.  « l | Promethean | l »   (talk) 22:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Please stop removing sources from the article that were added during this AfD. --Oakshade (talk) 23:48, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Note to closer - The above user is now stalking me and showing up at AfD's I've participated in to !vote against me and even reverted improvements/adding source I made to this article. --Oakshade (talk) 00:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Photos showing avenue c.1900 with streetcars goes far to establish notability.  Article has sources, meets wp:GNG.  Removing content during (or just before) an AFD is not cool. -- do  ncr  am  04:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per Doncram. Major street in major city. GNG for geographic location is adequate.  Montanabw (talk) 05:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.