Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fair use day

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 6 July 2005 01:41 (UTC)

Fair use day
Not notable. --W(t) 18:29, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
 * Keep --Not much of an article yet, but it's a real thing that deserves an entry. --Tysto 19:13, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
 * delete total 600 hits on google--Porturology 05:44, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porturology (talk • contribs) 03:04, 2005 Jun 26
 * Delete You have to be kidding me. --Hottentot
 * Delete Not notable? Try crystal ball, vanity, soapbox, not notable, unverifiable future event. -- Jonel | Speak 05:12, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can you believe someone went and read this one-word article and posted a spoken version? Unbelievable. &mdash; Phil Welch 14:10, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - The edit summary for the spoken version is "(add spoken version. it is a test of recording, not an endorsement of this article.)" I still think a better article for testing could have been found... -- Jonel | Speak 18:41, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I see nothing wrong with the idea. More people should take an interest in this issue
 * Unsigned comment by 68.53.45.0. User's 6th edit - 4 to sandboxes, 1 to Fair use adding the external link that used to be on Fair use day, then this VfD
 * Delete, not notable. Thue | talk 20:51, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I see nothing to suggest that anything about it is more than 1-2 hops away from the creator of the website. The website's bulletin board has 41 posts total. ps. I hope you enjoyed my spoken version of the article, it is not my only attempt. ;-) DanielHolth | talk. Nothing wrong with the idea of course, I just think the article smells of self-promotion.
 * Speedy the article and the recording. &mdash; Chameleon 2 July 2005 14:13 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.