Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairfax (typeface)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Fairfax (typeface)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted as it does not meet the WP:GNG. The only source provided is the official website for the typeface (not independent) and a WP:BEFORE search found no reliable, independent and significant coverage of the subject meaning it should be deleted. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 20:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging who prodded the article in the past -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 20:31, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of significant use or coverage, just a link to DaFont who will take any freeware fonts you donate them. Blythwood (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that the subject does not appear to be notable. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:44, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above; not notable. Power~enwiki (talk) 03:40, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.