Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairy Godmother (Shrek)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep and if you wish to merge this article, please start a merge dicussion, as there is no consensus here to delete the article either way. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 22:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Fairy Godmother (Shrek)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just an in-universe repetition of the plot of Shrek 2. It is therefore a duplication of that article, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Not non-notable. Popular character known by millions of people. --Oldak Quill 01:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to List of fairy tale characters in Shrek.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 01:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect per Brewcrewer; but cut most of the plot repetition. Jfire (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of fairy tale characters in Shrek. &mdash; X  S  G  05:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep She was the main villian in a very succesful animated film, this character has a right to its own page as much as the likes of Gaston, Jafar, Scar, etc. etc. etc. --AKR619 (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Without reliable sourcing, none of that matters since its the movie Shrek that is popular, not this individual character. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of fairy tale characters in Shrek.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  15:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - primary antagonist in popular sequel, Shrek 2.--- Jeremy (talk) 03:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.