Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith (model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 17:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Faith (model)



 * Delete: What purpose does this serve? it's just a pointless pornographic plug Frequency24 05:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - While her breast size is impressive, there is no assertion of notability in the article. If it had been around for longer than a week, I'd tag it for speedy.  However, in light of its youth, I'm willing to see if the author manages to get some more info that might make a case for why Faith should remain. →Bobby ← 20:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable aside from her tig ole bitties. DCEdwards1966 20:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable stub.  Spinach Dip 22:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete While she is unquestionably an attractive young lady, that does not make her eligible for an encyclopedia article.--Anthony.bradbury 01:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete her breasts might be notable, but she is not. Lankiveil 01:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC).
 * Keep She may not be notable to you people, but where I come from she is fairly well known. Simply because you do not know her does not make her unworthy of record.
 * Delete - NN, and the article is vacuous. Pete Fenelon 01:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Amir E. Aharoni 17:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.