Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith Abrahams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:37, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Faith Abrahams

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Subject has had a few minor roles, which does not meet the notability requirement for entertainers. ErikHaugen (talk) 16:15, 7 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually more than just a "few minor roles", having lead roles in multiple film, video, and television projects which actually seem to be pushing nicely at WP:ENT's "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". Further research may indicate that through her recurrences in the various film, video, and television projects of the fan-loved The Fairly OddParents, whether or not she may have also developed "a large fan base or a significant "cult" following".  Time for research.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * What lead roles are you referring to? You don't mean Francis, do you? ErikHaugen (talk) 01:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Francis is only part of her repeated television films since 2003 and being in a TV series from 2001 through 2008... as I note that not all are Fairly OddParents. This would seem to make her "Francis" when added to her other roles, as adding up to significant roles in multiple notable projects.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, I thought you said "lead roles." So my reading of imdb/etc is correct that she has had no lead roles, right? I think it's pretty clear that per wp:ent, her resume alone does not imply enough notability for wp. ErikHaugen (talk) 17:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Re-read WP:ENT. It stipulates "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions."  It does not say this must "only" be "lead" roles. And per WP:ENT, if verified in reliable sources, her career can indeed allow a reasonable presumption of notability for WP.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I would expect a BLP to have better sourcing, especially since this discussion has gone on so long.  Borderline WP:ENT, but I think it fails.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 03:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.