Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faithful amplification


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. KEEP as a combination of WP:IAR and WP:SNOW: the nominated article no longer exists, the copyvio properly Kerrrzappped. The new article may be renominated, of course, but I doubt that it will. Drmies (talk) 17:51, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Faithful amplification

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is directly copied from wiki.answers.com Wakowako (talk) 08:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article is not an obvious copyright violation from answers.com, but paraphrases it and adds other sources. I have expanded the article with an alternative source. -- Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   11:58, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 15:17, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - article has been re-phrased and expanded with references/sources and footnotes. It is quite significant in electronics technology. --Wakowako (talk) 05:59, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.