Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faithless daughters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 01:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Faithless daughters

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This claims to be a common motif in literature, but the term, referring to daughters who betray their father, does not seem to be in widespread use in the sense described here. I suggest deletion on the grounds of original research. Nydas (Talk) 09:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Borderline OR is a danger for all of the literary motif articles since they rely on opinion rather than fact, but there's enough evidence provided in this one to satisfy me that it is a legitimate motif. StuartDouglas 15:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research, and likely impossible to maintain. Realkyhick 22:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - It may be a genuine motif, but in this form it's still original research. Masaruemoto 18:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Although the article might do better to focus on the motif itself, rather than a list of figures who could be so considered. Smmurphy(Talk) 03:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, OR. Pavel Vozenilek 11:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - As far as I can see, most of the references don't use the term 'faithless daughter(s)' at all, and many of the entries are mythology and history, rather than just literature. Could the keep voters explain their position more clearly?-- Nydas (Talk) 11:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.