Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fake Democracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW Delete The article barely is coherent enough to be understood, and is not encyclopedic in anyway. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Fake Democracy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTESSAY Timothy Joseph Wood  13:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Fast Delete. Unsourced article that is unclear in it's focus. --Killer Moff (talk) 13:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced original research. -- Finngall  talk  15:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOT; but note that the phrase "fake democracy" is in fairly widespread use, notably in 1 2016 Essay by Helen Epstein in the New York Review of Books, The Cost of Fake Democracy, .E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy'd for A1. No context, just a disjoint rant by a single editor. Jergling (talk) 19:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * While certainly eligible for a WP:SNOW. Essay articles are not eligible under CSD. Timothy Joseph Wood  19:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * An essay implies some structure or goal. This is borderline nonsense and lacks context to explain what "Fake Democracy" is. Is it a concept? A neologism? A movement? A rock band? Jergling (talk) 19:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * P.S. I am naming my new rock band "Fake Democracy". Please don't steal it. Jergling (talk) 19:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.