Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falana v. Kent State Univ. (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Falana v. Kent State Univ.
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable case precedent, in spite of the text "was a notable case precedent" in the lead. First AfD was closed as no consensus. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 22:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. This is Federal Circuit case has received substantial coverage in legal scholarship. See, for example, these law journal articles:   ; see also these articles from other news sources:   . We routinely keep articles about precedent-setting federal circuit court cases, and this article is no exception. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability clearly established by Notecard's sourcing above and in the previous AfD. James (talk/contribs) 14:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:02, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: This case sets significant precedent. Orthogonal1 (talk) 11:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.