Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falcon 20 kish accident


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Falcon 20 kish accident

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This seems to be translated using Google translate, and is totally unclear what the article is about. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment this air accident got some press coverage when it happened, but I don't see this passing the WP:EVENT guideline or complying with the advice from WP:AIRCRASH. A very old plane having an accident in Iran may be unfortunate, but it's not that unusual. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * , why does it have to be unusual, and who says it is not. It seems to be the only crash documented at wikipedia that involves a Falcon 20. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable, just one bizjet accident of hundreds every year--Petebutt (talk) 18:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I disagree with the nomination rationale which says: "totally unclear what the article is about". It is very clear to me that this is about a disaster involving a plane that crashed near Kish Lake. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * It is clear now, but at the moment I nominated the page for deletion, it looked like this: . Vanjagenije (talk) 00:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * So your sole rationale for deletion is no longer valid. You may or may not be aware of the option of withdrawing the nomination. Anarchangel (talk) 21:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Does not cross the various bars for notability. No Wikinotable people killed, no lasting impact, no WP:PERSISTENCE. Wikipedia is not the news and is also not a crystal ball - if this becomes notable later, it can be recreated, there is no deadline, but there is no need to keep a non-notable article on the grounds that it might. - The Bushranger One ping only 12:36, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.