Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falen Bonsett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 05:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Falen Bonsett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable radio personality, all news refs are either PR or merely passing. Though not a reason for deletion, per se, article has been a drama magnet as well. Wood not bang. TransporterMan ( TALK ) 23:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: This article's subject lacks the notability necessary for a Wikipedia article, therefore failing WP:NOTABILITY/WP:PERSON. Blurp92 (talk) 02:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Single-market radio personalities do not get an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist; they get articles only if and when they can be sourced over WP:GNG for something of more than purely local significance. But of the four sources here, two are her own self-published social networking profiles, one is a deadlink of an article about her being named one of the "hottest" women in radio — as if physical appearance had anything to do with success in an audio-only medium! — in a non-notable other radio host's self-created and unscientific poll, and the last is a non-substantive blurb about her getting married. A person does not get an article the moment one or two reliable sources nominally verify that she exists; she gets an article when reliable sources are substantively covering her in a context that constitutes a notability claim. Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.