Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallacy of prescience


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 06:39, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Fallacy of prescience

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for single-source, I found only wikiclones after searching, so notability is lacking. It was created in 2007, but the creator's user page makes one suspect a conflict of interest. Tigraan Click here to contact me 12:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Too thin and lacking in notability. Andrew D. (talk) 06:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete A single, dated, and primary source that is not independent of the researchers proposing the term is far bellow the threshold necessary to establish notability. This is essentially a case of an attempt to up-jump a WP:Neologism--and considering that the source was released more than a decade ago and not a single other researcher or source has embraced it, I think it's clear that it never broke into popular usage.  Indeed, the one source that does exist is not sufficient to support more than two sentences of content.  I just can't see any justification for maintaining this article.  S n o w  let's rap 05:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Bearian (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.