Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falling In Reverse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Falling In Reverse
They are on the billboard 200 now that shows nobility http://www.billboard.com/#/album/falling-in-reverse/the-drug-in-me-is-you/1505677   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesk715 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable "Myspace" band. Article asserts notability based upon band being signed with Epitaph Records, yet bands official Myspace page clearly states "unsigned". Previously CSD'd and then recreated. Chasingsol(talk) 20:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 20:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Unsigned band, does not appear to pass WP:MUSIC. Kinoq (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 *  Merge Delete with Ronnie Radke. Band has been in existence for less than a year. Racepacket (talk) 21:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Radke redirects to Escape the Fate - BalthCat (talk) 08:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Falling in Reverse is a well known band. Anyone who favors the old ETF with Ronnie in it knows Falling in Reverse. There is even an magazine issue that is based on Ronnie and Falling in Reverse. Ronnie gets out December 15, not too far away. There is no point in deleting the Falling in Reverse page.Tech395 (talk) 03:58, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * We need sources/evidence: How can we KNOW that they are a well known band?  We can't take your claim of notability on faith.  Do you have links to reviews in major media?  important non-blog websites that review/cover the genre of music they create?  etc. - BalthCat (talk) 08:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

http://thronemagazine.com/ This is the linkTech395 (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.