Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. In the few searches that I did, the results where torrent sites, locatetv and other sites like it, a BBC site, and a program guide. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The film has over 200 hits in a google search. Referring cites span from Australia to South Korea. The torrent sites are valid.  They indicate that there are many people sharing the film and seeking to see the film.Dogru144 (talk) 00:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * None of that stuff shows notability per WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom fails WP:NF
 * Delete This isn't notable. J 10987 (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This is notable. Again, I return to the fact that there are over 200 hits in Google relating to this page.  Again, I note that the attention garnered is in several international websites.  The above delete votes are votes, without discussion (except in the case of the initiator of the proposal).Dogru144 (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I checked imdb, the NYCOSH website, and the ProQuest periodicals database, which didn't even mention this short documentary. Google hits, while easy, are not sole proof of notability (heck, I get 79,000 hits on my own real name and I'm not notable either). Her Pegship  (tis herself) 17:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - NO evidence of notability presented (200 googlehits is nothing). -- Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  18:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.