Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Fallout (series). Mark Arsten (talk) 02:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Fallout 4

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Bethesda has yet to confirm Fallout 4's existence, so this article definitely falls under WP:TOOSOON, when this information should be placed at Fallout (series), pending an official announcement. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 08:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete – I just read the article, and that's certainly a lot of words to essentially say, "This presumably exists, but we don't know anything about it." Most of it doesn't even look like it would be worth merging into a section on the franchise about its future.  WAYTOOSOON. Egsan Bacon (talk) 15:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge + Redirect to Fallout (series), and protect this article until such a time that we have better affirmation on F4. TOOSOON applies, but it is a reasonable search term since they've hinted the series will continue, hence to keep what's here (which does have some value) in the main series article and redirect it. --M ASEM (t) 18:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect per Masem and GSK. Ansh666 20:57, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge + Redirect to Fallout (series). This is a nice synthesis of fragmentary sources, but I was not able to find multiple in-depth reliable sources needed for notability and synthesis is not allowed. I agree that this is a reasonable search term and merging a short verifiable summary into Fallout (series) is warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 22:09, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect - This topic fails WP:N, it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources, not a single source discusses the subject directly in detail. Same arguments I made in the Chrono Break AFD. - hahnch e n 16:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect What's at Fallout (series) is sufficient. There doesn't seem to be anything to merge. --BDD (talk) 22:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.