Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/False Sexuality


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Alex ShihTalk 14:29, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

False Sexuality

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

With no references, this appears to be entirely original research, and the title phrase appears to be the author's neologism.

The cleanup comment is correct in that this article is nearly incomprehensible, but it appears that even if it were reworked, it would be of no encyclopedic value. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:04, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I had originally PRODed this before Robert sent it to AfD. I'll go with my reasoning there: this is pure original research which is excluded by WP:NOT. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, personal essay. --Hirsutism (talk) 23:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Unreferenced, unverifiable, non-notable, neologistic, poorly written essay.  --Lockley (talk) 19:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the reasons above. No reason to attempt a speedy delete with this almost at seven days. Power~enwiki (talk) 03:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.