Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/False berry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keep as per guidelines. Capitalistroadster 10:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

False berry
AFD only posted on the article, not properly included on the AFD page. Listing it here for proper debate. Elkman 02:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

(Note: Talk:False berry contains some debate about deleting False berry, but it wasn't properly included in this AFD.)


 * Keep. This article provides information about False Berries, as well as organizing all false berry bearing plants on the same page Cliffb 23:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although brief, the article is informative--more so than many Wiki articles. andersonpd 18:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. For reasons stated above. SB Johnny 10:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above. --Janke | Talk 21:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. As far as I can tell, it's a valid botanical term.  If this is wrong, or a hoax, maybe a botanist can tell us.  --Elkman 02:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above comment. Mike (T C) [[Image:Star_of_life2.svg|20px]] 02:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Strong Keep A poorly researched afd call. A google books text search shows several authoritative sources using this term http://books.google.com/books?q=%22false+berry%22&btnG=Search+Books&as_brr=0 Bwithh 02:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep "berry: A simple fruit with single or multiple carpels having a fleshy pericarp with no accessory parts (a true berry) or with accessory parts (a false berry)." from TedTalk/Contributions 03:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep due to poorly-researched AfD nomination. --Coredesat talk 04:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, valid term and informative article. --Musicpvm 07:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep lack of proper AfD suggests not a serious nom. -- N  scheffey (T/C) 08:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.