Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Familiar (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Familiar (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article fails WP:JUSTPLOT, as it contains no real-world context, WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE, and WP:GNG, as it contains no sources, and has been tagged as unsourced for over six years. Not a very active user (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Minor fictional concept. This one doesn't even bother to cite any sources, primary or otherwise.  Actually searching for sources does not bring up anything substantial in reliable, secondary sources.  As there is no sourced content here, there is nothing that should be retained. Rorshacma (talk) 16:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not the monster manual. WP:GAMEGUIDE -- Sirfurboy (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not supposed to be the monster manual. Until Nov. 1st or so it was, but that is another story.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fancrufty article, fails WP:GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lacks sufficient RS to pass the GNG. Chetsford (talk) 02:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.