Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family2.0


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Family2.0

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article's lead suggests two possible meanings. A google search for the term shows relatively low adoption by non-bloggers, in which circumstance it refers to various sites which focus on family development and such (child-rearing sites for new moms, family counseling forums, etc.) The article, by contrast, implies this term refers to a growing online genealogy community, and/or a neologism. It further comprises a table of purportedly notable sites, without foundation, or substantiation, and whose selective nature represents WP:OR/SYNTH issues. ThuranX (talk) 14:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:21, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:V verifiability test - there is nothing to confirm that the concept actually exists or is used as defined here. --MelanieN (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 15:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - Article itself is a bit vague. Doesn't appear particularly notable or to be in common usage, and would probably fail WP:NEO, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  17:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge:parts with List of genealogy databases or List of genealogy portals if needed and redirect/delete page. Term not used as far as I can see.. gioto (talk) 06:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge or keep:The comparison table is now moved into List of genealogy databases. A google search on geneaology+"family 2.0" gives 1320 hits. However, in google books and google scholar similar searches (e.g. on "family tree"+"family 2.0" only gives about 5 real hits. Mange01 (talk) 00:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.