Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Guy Recurring Gags and Characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  05:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Family Guy Recurring Gags and Characters

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to be entirely original research, also unsourced VivioFa teFan   (Talk, Sandbox) 02:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as original research, unsourced, and most likely unverifiable. Oh yeah, and fancruft too. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete enough to give a person a recurring gag. Example: "Stewie always has an evil plan and wants to kill Lois."  Witty commentary: "What an ungrateful kid, the lady gave birth to him and he wants to kill her."  Another example: "Peter always gets people to do stupid stuff or does stupid stuff himself."  I've noticed that pattern too.  Mandsford (talk) 02:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete idem (what they said) Pearrari (talk) 02:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep How am I supposed to post a source for scenes and characters ? Good luck trying to find that source !OK, I already put that information on the Family Guy page . It got deleted there too . It's official , Wikipedia is dead . It's no longer a place to post useful information . This is another way that democracy , freedom of speech and liberty are dead too . Oh , Family Guy made an episode about that , PTV ! Goodbye , Democracy ! Liberty is Dead . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilgunner94 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment You want the joint one block over. --Dhartung | Talk 07:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Original research, redundant information etc, basically everything thats been said. Milonica (talk) 02:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced original research. Lilgunner, there are thousands of websites out there which can be used to post this kind of information. (Useful? In what sense?) Wikipedia is not one of them. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  02:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, personal feelings aside. We don't need a separate article for all this. J- ſtan ContribsUser page 04:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely unencyclopedic and trivia to boot. Maybe (as in probably not) include a few (i.e., one or two) examples of the more frequent gags in the main Family Guy article. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 05:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, trivia. --Dhartung | Talk 07:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because as above, the same information is now on the main page. --Arcanios (talk) 09:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. This is very good for a fan site. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete even though I think it's good information for a Family Guy fan, it doesn't seem like something an encyclopedia like Wikipedia would need. Maybe some of them could be added to the Family Guy page here at Wikipedia or at a Family Guy fan site? ~NeonFire372~ (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete per WP:NOR and WP:NOT to quote just two key policies that this falls foul of.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 16:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete entirely unecyclopedic fancruft. I love this show, but I don't think a WP article needs to be here just to tell us Chris has a monkey in his closet.   Merry   Christmas  from Sasha 22:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. (jarbarf) (talk) 00:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is a notable show that is in part notable because of its recurring gags and characters. Sincerely, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 01:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.