Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Guy in Star Wars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g3, obvious hoax = vandalism. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Family Guy in Star Wars

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Obvious hoax, editor removed speedy tag so I'm listing it here. Torchwood Who? (talk) 02:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- Obvious hoax- if it hasn't been made yet how can it be NC 17? No google hits either.--Mars2035 (talk) 03:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Why would they do this again (Blue Harvest (Family Guy))? --Canley (talk) 03:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.   —Canley (talk) 03:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:CRYSTAL if not a hoax. JJL (talk) 03:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above.  Lady   Galaxy  03:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax, neither reference is valid SkierRMH  ( talk ) 04:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom. Risker (talk) 04:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No matter how good John Leguizamo might be as Glenn Quagmire (as C-3P0, I suppose) this is a poor attempt at a hoax. Delete with all due haste. - Dravecky (talk) 05:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Excellent points above, but I'm wondering why the links in the infobox direct to info about Titan A.E.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 06:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Someone probably copied an infobox from there or something. This would also explain the John Leguizamo bit; the budgets are also the same. Celarnor Talk to me  09:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax or WP:CRYSTAL. Take your pick. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 07:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete hoaxalicous. Minor point - although you can't speedy something for being a hoax, the author can't remove speedy tags from their own pages. JuJube (talk) 10:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Technically they can, as in they can perform the "act" of removing a speedy tag. Instead of edit-warring over it I decided to just bring it here. Also, I think patent nonsense can apply to hoaxes of this kind.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 10:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The nonsense thing was a joke. I just realized I'd get about 10 talk page messages if people thought I was serious.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 10:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The G3 vandalism speedy criteria includes blatant hoaxes now. DarkAudit (talk) 14:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as hoax.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax content and redirect to Blue Harvest (Family Guy) to discourage recreation. 23skidoo (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per G3 as blatant hoax. Hoaxes are now speediable. DarkAudit (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.