Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Mosaic (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Peabody Trust. Kurykh (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Family Mosaic
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not quite sure if this passes WP:GNG and so would like to take this through AfD. Peabody is definitely an important organisation in London, but I'm not sure if 'Family Mosaic' is. Would appreciate some independent views on this. Best, Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  21:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:ORGDEPTH. Also meets WP:AUD per non-local coverage, such as in BBC News and The Guardian. North America1000 04:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge – per my comment and discussion below. North America1000 01:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

 References
 * Merge We normally do not consider consumer complaints as sufficient for notability, because they have no connection with the significance of the organization but are just incidental. We also normally do not consider local papers within a city sufficient for notability  However, some of these are not individual tenant complaints, and one was in the Guardian.  I do not count the Times reference  because it  is not The Times in the usual sense but the Hendon & Finchley, Barnett & Potters Bar, Edgware & Mill Hill  Times which is one of their local online supplements. It's not at all the same thing)  The BBC is also  not their national service, but the London edition, but at least it's not a neighborhood version; however, it is an individual complaint.   That basically leaves the Ivory reference only, which is a general article that in one small part of the articles reports an isolated study that happened to use this particular association. I notice that of the other such associations, some are even scantier than this, and some are perhaps excessively detailed. The obvious solution to this one is to merge with Peabody.   DGG ( talk ) 13:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This request seems incredibly reasonable. I would like to second merge. Best, Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  15:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment – I would be fine with a merge to Peabody Trust. North America1000 17:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 (c)  22:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Does anyone disagree with Merge? Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  22:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge - Seems a good idea under the circumstances. Nearly all the coverage of this housing association is negative, and it does not seem fair for us to have articles on "failing" housing associations while not having them about better run establishments which have not therefore garnered so much press coverage. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, until the business merger is completed, then merge and redirect to Peabody. Family Mosaic is one of the G15 (housing associations) which IMHO indicates notability. – Fayenatic  L ondon 13:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.