Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Tree of House Blackfyre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Family Tree of House Blackfyre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Consists entirely of WP:OR; in any case, non-notable subpage. The family lacks its own article, and a subpage such as this has no reason to exist on its own. Redirected once already today. No reliable sources discuss this topic, , which makes this a synthesis of them at the very best. No coverage = No WP:N. Fails WP:GNG. &mdash; O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  17:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)  &mdash;  O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  17:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Way too premature to nominate this page for deletion. It's existed for less than four hours! TedEdwards (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Sources can easily be added later. And not even House Stark or House Lannister has its own article, making that arguement redundant. TedEdwards (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:22, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as trivial and redundant: This family tree only has two actual links, both of which are redirects. These characters are not as notable as others in the series because they (as yet) only appear in some minor written works, and there appear to be no reliable sources that discuss them. Finally, this family is already covered in Family tree of House Targaryen.— TAnthonyTalk 22:24, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This tree has been moved to a template, to be placed in Tales of Dunk and Egg, the article where its current redirects lead, per the edit summary. As we do not create templates for use in a single article, I have instead placed the content directly into that article, where its inclusion can be discussed. This standalone, unused tree should be deleted ASAP.— TAnthonyTalk 20:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Annnd I moved it back, as this AfD is active and not in template space.— TAnthonyTalk 22:19, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Already on Tales of Dunk and Egg. Only used once. - AffeL (talk) 10:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 16:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.